با همکاری انجمن‏‌ بیماری شناسی گیاهی ایران

نوع مقاله : مدیریت آفات و بیماری‌های گیاهی

نویسندگان

1 زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ایلام، ایلام ایران

2 زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ایلام، ایلام، ایران

3 2.بخش تحقیقات گیاهان زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی کردستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، سنندج، ایران

چکیده

کرم غلاف­خوار Helicoverpa armigera  (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)، مهم­ترین آفت مزارع نخود است که باعث کاهش عملکرد قابل توجهی در نخود می­­شود. این مطالعه برای غربالگری مقاومت 40 لاین نخود در برابر کرم غلاف­خوار در قالب طرح بلوک­های کامل تصادفی در سه تکرار درمزرعه­ای آزمایشی درشهرستان اسلام آباد غرب انجام شد. آلودگی در مرحله غلاف­دهی انجام شد. در این آزمایش جمعیت کرم غلاف‌خوار، درصد خسارت غلاف و عملکرد دانه اندازه­گیری شد. نتایج نشان داد که ژنوتیپ­های نخود به آسیب ناشی از کرم غلاف­خوار واکنش متفاوتی نشان دادند و میزان عملکرد همه لاین­ها در شرایط آلودگی کاهش داشت ولی بین لاین­ها تفاوت معنی‌داری وجود داشت. FL IP99-48C حساس‌ترین ژنوتیپ با کمترین عملکرد بود. ژنوتیپ‌های FL IP07-40C (از نوع کابلی) و پیروز (از نوع دسی ) کمترین جمعیت کرم غلاف­خوار و بالاترین عملکرد را داشتند و به‌عنوان مقاوم­ترین ژنوتیپ­ها انتخاب شدند. بنابراین از این ژنوتیپ­ها می­توان در برنامه­های اصلاحی در آینده استفاده کرد.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Resistant evaluation of chickpea genotypes against chickpea (Cicer arietinum) Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera in field

نویسندگان [English]

  • Shokoufeh Akbari 1
  • Zahra Tahmasebi 2
  • Homayoun Kanouni 3

1 Agricultural College, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran

2 Agricultural College, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran

3 Research Associate, Field and Horticultural Crops Reseach Unit, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center of Kurdistan, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Iran

چکیده [English]

Chickpea pod borer (CPB), Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is the most important pest on chickpea (Cicer arietinum), which causes substantial yield losses. This study was carried out to screen resistance of 40 chickpea accessions against CPB in a field trial in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications in Eslamabad-e Gharb. Plant infestation with this pest was done at the podding stage. In this experiment several traits including pod borer’s population, percentage of pod damage and grain yield were measured. The results indicated that genotypes responded differently to CPB. Also, the yield of all lines in infestation condition decreased, but there was a significant difference between the lines. FL IP99-48C demonstrated to be the most susceptible with the least yield. FL IP07-40C (that is Kabuli type) and Pirouz (that is a Desi genotype) recorded as the most resistant genotypes in terms of reducing the CPB population and the highest yield that can be used in breeding programs in the future.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Breeding program
  • damage
  • grain yield
AHMAD, M., I. DENHOLM and BROMILOW, R., 2006. Delayed circular penetration and enhanced metabolism of deltamethrin in pyrethroid-resistant strains of Helicoverpa armigera from China and Pakistan. Pest Management Science.62: 805-810.
BHATT, N.J. and PATEL, R.K., 2001. Screening of chickpea genotypes for their resistance to gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera. Indian Journal of Entomology, 63(3): 277-280.
BORIKARo, P.S., A.N. MADANSURE, N.D. JAMBHALE, N.D. GITE and MISSAL, M.B., 1982. Damage caused by Heliothis armigera Hubner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Entomology, .44: 290-292.
BOUSLAMA, T., A. LAARIF, A. SOLTANIoltani, I. CHAIEB, M. AMIR and RHOUMAhoum, A., 2019. Screening chickpea lines and varieties for a possible resistance or tolerance to the pod borer Helicoverpa armigera. Tunis. Journal of Plant Prottection,.14(1): 69-81.
DIAS, C.A.R., S.S. LAL and YADAVA, C.P., 1983. Differences in susceptibility of certain chickpea cultivars and local collection to Heliothis armigera (Hubner). Indian Journal of Agricural Science 53: 842-845.
HASHEMI AGHAIARI, M. and HASAPOUR HOSNI, M., 1994. An investigation on bioecology of Chloridea viriplaca and Ch. peltigera in Maragheh and Hashtrood. Dryland Areas Research Institutet Reports. 93 pp.
HEMATI, S.A., NASERI, B., GANBALANI, G.N., DASTIERDI, H.R., GOLIZADE, A., 2012. Effect of Different Host Plants on Nutritional Indices of the Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera. Journal of Insect Science, 12:1-15.
HOSSAIN, M., HAQUE, M., and PRODHANA, M. 2008. Effect of pods characteristics on pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner), investigation in chickpea. SAARC Journal of Agriculture, 6: 1-11.
ICRISAT. 1992. The medium term plan. Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT).
JAKHAR, P., Y. KUMAR and ARUN, J.A.N.U., 2018. Varietal screening in chickpea against gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) in field conditions using biochemical parameters. EKIN, Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics, 4(2): 33-38.
KARTHIK, G. S. and VADTRAD, A.S., 2018. Morphological characterization of chickpea genotypes and their influence on Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) population and its natural enemies. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 6(6): 1220-1225.
KHAN, S.M., YASSER, M., INAYATULLAH, I., KHAN, M.A., 2009. Varietal screening of chickpea and the efficacy of different insecticides against chickpea pod borer Helicoverpa armigera (Hb.). The Gomal University Journal of Research, 25(1): 20-24.
NADEEM, S., M. HAMED, M. SHAFIQUE, B.M. ATTA and SHAH, T.M., 2011. Evaluation for resistance in Kabuli chickpea genotypes against chickpea pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) under field conditions. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, 33(3):291-294
NOORI, P. and SHAHRYARI, D., 1985. Pests, diseases and weeds of food legumes in Iran. Pests and Diseases Research Institute. 78 pp.
PARVEZ, A, ALAM, M.A., ILYAS, M.B., 1996. Studies on the varietal resistance of chickpea against Helicoverpa armigera (Hb.). The Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 33:91-93.
REMBOLD, H., 1981. Malic acid in chickpea exudate–a marker for Heliothis resistance. International Chickpea Newsletter, 4: 18-19.
SARWAR, M., 2013. Exploration on resource of resistance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes to gram pod borer Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera). African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(26):3431-3435.
SARWAR, M., AHMAD, N., TOFIQUE, M., 2009. Host plant resistance relationships in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) against gram pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) (Hubner). The Pakistan Journal of Botany, 41(6):3047-3052.
SARWAR, M., AHMAD, N., TOFIQUE, M., 2011. Identification of susceptible and tolerant gram (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes against gram pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) (Hubner). Pakistan Journal of Botany,43(2):1265-1270.
SEYYEDI SAHEBARI, F., and BAHRAMI, N., 2004. Population density and infestation rate of pod borers (Helicoverpa spp.) on expectation and spring planted chickpeas in Maragheh and Kermanshah region. The Journal of Applied Entomology, 1: 129-140.
SHABBIR, M. Z., ARSHAD, M., HUSSAIN, B., NADEEM, I., ALI, S., ABBASI A., and ALI, Q., 2014. Genotypic response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) for resistance against gram pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera). Advancements in Life Sciences, 2(1): 23-30.
SHANKAR, M, MUNGHATE, R.S., BABU, T.R., SRIDEVI, D and SHARMA, H.C., 2014. Population density and damage by pod borers, Helicoverpa armigera and Spodoptera exigua in a diverse array of chickpea genotypes under natural infestation in the field. Indian Journal of Entomology, 76(2): 117-127.
SHARMA, H.C., B.U. SINGH, K.V. HARIPRASAD and BRAMEL-COX, P.J., 1999. Host-plant resistance to insects in integrated pest management for a safer environment. Proceedings, Academy of Environmental Biology, 8(1):113-136.
Xu, X., L. Yu and Y. Wu. 2005. Disruption of a cadherin gene associated with resistance to Cry1Ac δ-endotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis in Helicoverpa armigera. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71(2): 948-954.